The University of La Réunion undertakes to make its website accessible in accordance with article 47 of law no. 2005-102 of February 11, 2005.

To this end, it implements the following strategy and actions:

The main sections of Span 2022-2025 are:

The 2022-2025 Span is also available in:

Compliance status

The website does not comply with the general framework for improving accessibility (RGAA), version 4.1, due to the non-conformities and deviations listed below.

Test results

The compliance audit carried out by Remainder reveals that:

  • 49% of RGAA criteria are met.
    This is the number of criteria fully respected on all the pages in the sample.
  • The average compliance rate for the online service is 78%.
    This is the average of the compliance score obtained on each of the pages in the sample.
  • Access to the audit grid (PDF 118 KB)

Non-accessible content


We list all the non-compliant criteria below. For details, refer to the audit grid and the multi-year plan for the continuous improvement plan.

  • 1.1 Does each image carrying information have a textual alternative?
  • 1.3 For each information-carrying image having a textual alternative, is this alternative relevant (except in special cases)?
  • 1.7 For each information-carrying image having a detailed description, is this description relevant?
  • 1.8 Each text image carrying information, in the absence of a replacement mechanism, must if possible be replaced by stylish text. Is this rule respected (except in special cases)?
  • 1.9 Is each image caption, where necessary, correctly linked to the corresponding image?
  • 3.2 In each web page, is the contrast between the color of the text and the color of its background high enough (except in special cases)?
  • 3.3 In each web page, are the colors used in the interface components or graphic elements carrying information sufficiently contrasted (except in special cases)?
  • 4.1 Does each pre-recorded time-based media have, if necessary, a textual transcription or audio description (except in special cases)?
  • 4.4 For each pre-recorded synchronized time-based media that has synchronized captions, are those captions relevant?
  • 4.7 Is each temporal media clearly identifiable (except in special cases)?
  • 6.1 Is each link explicit (except in special cases)?
  • 7.1 Is each script, if necessary, compatible with assistive technologies?
  • 7.3 Is each script controllable by the keyboard and by any pointing device (except in special cases)?
  • 7.4 For each script that initiates a context switch, is the user notified or does he have control?
  • 7.5 On each web page, are status messages correctly rendered by assistive technologies?
  • 8.2 For each web page, is the generated source code valid according to the specified document type?
  • 8.3 Is the default language present on each web page?
  • 8.6 For each web page with a page title, is this title relevant?
  • 8.7 In each web page, is each language change indicated in the source code (except in special cases)?
  • 8.9 In each web page, tags must not be used solely for presentation purposes. Is this rule respected?
  • 9.3 In each web page, is each list correctly structured?
  • 10.1 On the website, are style sheets used to control the presentation of information?
  • 10.2 In each web page, does the visible content remain present when the style sheets are deactivated?
  • 10.10 In each web page, information must not be given by shape, size or position only. Is this rule implemented appropriately?
  • 10.11 For each web page, can the contents be presented without having to resort to vertical scrolling for a window with a height of 256px or horizontal scrolling for a window with a width of 320px (except in special cases)?
  • 11.1 Does each form field have a label?
  • 11.2 Is each label associated with a form field relevant (except in special cases)?
  • 11.9 In each form, is the title of each button relevant (except in special cases)?
  • 11.10 In each form, is the input control used in a relevant manner (except in special cases)?
  • 11.11 In each form, is the input check accompanied, if necessary, by suggestions to facilitate the correction of input errors?
  • 11.12 For each form that modifies or deletes data, or which transmits answers to a test or examination, or whose validation has financial or legal consequences, can the data entered be modified, updated or retrieved by the user ?
  • 11.13 Can the purpose of an input field be inferred to facilitate automatic filling of fields with user data?
  • 12.3 Is the “site map” page relevant?
  • 12.6 Can content grouping areas found on multiple web pages (header, main navigation, main content, footer and search engine areas) be reached or avoided?
  • 13.3 On each web page, does each downloadable office document have, if necessary, an accessible version (except in special cases)?

Exemptions for disproportionate burden

There is no exemption for disproportionate burden.

Content not subject to the accessibility obligation

Article 3 of Decree No. 2019-768 of July 24, 2019 lists content exempt from the accessibility obligation.

Under 5e de l 'article 3 of decree 2019-768, are exempt from the accessibility obligation:

“Third party content which is neither financed nor developed by the organization concerned and which is not under its control”.

This is the case of the Youtube video player used for the “2021 Registration – Instructions for use” video on the sample page 6 titled “Registration”. Criteria 4.11 and 4.13 relating to the video player are not applicable for this content.

As this is the only content applicable on this page, criteria 4.11 and 4.13 are not applicable on page 6 of the sample.

Establishment of this accessibility statement

This declaration was established on November 18, 2022.

Technologies used for the creation of the website

The following technologies are used on the website:

  • HTML 5
  • CSS
  • JavaScript

User agents, assistive technologies and tools used to verify accessibility

Web page testing was performed with the following web browser and screen reader combinations:

User agentAssistive technology
Firefox 107.0NVDA 2022.3
Firefox 107.0JAWS 2021

Used tools

The following tools were used during the evaluation:

  • RGAA extension published by DINUM for Firefox;

Site pages that have been subject to compliance verification

Structured sample

Random sample

You searched for disability

Feedback and contact

If you are unable to access any content or service, you can contact the digital service manager to be directed to an accessible alternative or obtain the content in another form.


This procedure is to be used in the following case.

You have reported to the website manager an accessibility defect that prevents you from accessing content or one of the portal's services and you have not obtained a satisfactory response or response.

Top of page